Multi-Objective Optimization for Sustainable Production Systems: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review of Routing Models, Efficiency, and Sustainability Performance

Authors

  • Indra Saputra STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • Grace Yulianti STIE Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70142/jbl.v3i2.70

Keywords:

Multi objective optimization, Sustainable production systems, Production routing, Sustainability performance, Pareto optimization

Abstract

This study presents a qualitative systematic literature review of multi objective optimization for sustainable production systems, focusing on production routing models, computational efficiency, and sustainability performance. The review synthesizes research on the integration of production, inventory, distribution, and routing decisions and examines the incorporation of economic, environmental, and social objectives into optimization models. Using a systematic search and screening approach guided by PRISMA principles, the study identifies major methodological developments, sustainability indicators, optimization techniques, and research gaps. The findings indicate a progressive shift from cost oriented production routing models toward integrated multi objective frameworks that address sustainability trade offs. Economic performance remains the most established dimension, while environmental performance is increasingly incorporated through emissions and fuel consumption measures. Social sustainability remains comparatively underdeveloped, particularly regarding quantitative safety and accident risk indicators. The review highlights Pareto based approaches, including weighted sum and AUGMECON2 methods, as important tools for balancing competing objectives. The study proposes future research directions emphasizing scalable, integrated, and triple bottom line optimization models.

References

Abdullahi, H., Reyes-Rubiano, L., Ouelhadj, D., Faulin, J., & Juan, A. A. (2021). Modelling and multi-criteria analysis of the sustainability dimensions for the green vehicle routing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 292 (1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.028

Adulyasak, Y., Cordeau, J.-F., & Jans, R. (2015). The production routing problem: A review of formulations and solution algorithms. Computers & Operations Research, 55, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2014.01.011

Agra, A., Requejo, C., & Rodrigues, F. (2018). A hybrid heuristic for a stochastic production-inventory-routing problem. Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics, 64, 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endm.2018.02.009

Alvarez, A., Miranda, P., & Rohmer, S. U. K. (2022). Production routing for perishable products. Omega, 111, Article 102667.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102667

Bektaş, T., & Laporte, G. (2011). The pollution-routing problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45 (8), 1232–1250.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.02.004

Darvish, M., Archetti, C., & Coelho, L. C. (2019). Trade-offs between environmental and economic performance in production and inventory-routing problems. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 269–280.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.020

Fortes, A., et al. (2022). Efficient matheuristics to solve a rich production-routing problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 169, Article 108369.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108369

Garside, A. K., Muhtazaruddin, M. N. B., Ahmad, R., & Mukhlason, A. (2025). A novel multi-objective optimization model for production routing problem with sustainability dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 502, 145273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145273

Hrabec, D., Hvattum, L. M., & Hoff, A. (2022). The value of integrated planning for production, inventory, and routing decisions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, Article 108468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108468

Kusnanto, E. (2022). Performance Measurement Based on Balance Scorecard Perspective of Sustainable Leadership, Corporate Governance and Human Capital in Banking Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 4(1), 41–58.

Li, Y., Chu, F., Chu, C., & Zhu, Z. (2019). An efficient three-level heuristic for the large-scaled multi-product production routing problem with outsourcing. European Journal of Operational Research, 272 (3), 914–927.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.018

Malladi, K. T., & Sowlati, T. (2018). Sustainability aspects in inventory routing problem: A review of new trends in the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.224

Mavrotas, G., & Florios, K. (2013). An improved version of the augmented ε-constraint method (AUGMECON2) for finding the exact Pareto set in multi-objective integer programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219 (18), 9652–9669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.03.002

Messmann, L., Zender, V., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2020). How to quantify social impacts in strategic supply chain optimization: State of the art. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257, Article 120459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120459

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Patricia, M. C. (2023). Sustainable Retail Financing in Turbulent and Difficult Market Conditions: A Dynamic Capability Perspective. Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research, 4(1), 17-29.

Peivastehgar, H. R., et al. (2023). A green production routing problem for medical nitrous oxide: Model and solution approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 230, Article 120704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120704

Qiu, Y., Qiao, J., & Pardalos, P. M. (2017). A branch-and-price algorithm for production routing problems with carbon cap-and-trade. Omega, 68, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.06.001

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Solyalı, O., & Süral, H. (2017). A multi-phase heuristic for the production routing problem. Computers & Operations Research, 87, 114–124.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.06.007

Sun, H., et al. (2023). Trade-offs between economic and environmental goals of production-inventory-routing problem for multiple perishable products. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 178, Article 109133.

Thoha, N., Fauzi, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2021). Operational resilience and human capital: Toward corporate sustainable longevity in Indonesian Jamu industry. In International Conference on Business, Economics and Sustainable Development (ICBESD 2020) (pp. 51-58). Springer, Singapore.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14 (3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Indra Saputra, & Grace Yulianti. (2026). Multi-Objective Optimization for Sustainable Production Systems: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review of Routing Models, Efficiency, and Sustainability Performance. Journal of Economic and Leadership, 3(2), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.70142/jbl.v3i2.70

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.