Balancing Consultation and Control: The Governance Role of Incubators in Entrepreneurial Development

Authors

  • Ully Rohana Rinjani Manurung STIE Kasih Bangsa
  • Ruslaini STIE Kasih Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70142/jbl.v1i4.14

Keywords:

Incubator governance, , entrepreneurial development, entrepreneurial development, control, start-up success

Abstract

This qualitative literature review explores the governance role of incubators in entrepreneurial development, focusing on the balance between consultation and control. Incubators provide strategic guidance, resources, and networks, fostering innovation and strategic planning. Simultaneously, they exercise control by setting performance targets, tracking progress, and enforcing organizational structures, ensuring discipline and focus among entrepreneurs. The review highlights the complementary nature of these dual roles, which are essential for enabling start-ups to leverage both strategic guidance and operational discipline, contributing to their long-term success and sustainability. However, the study acknowledges limitations, including the need for empirical research and the exploration of additional governance dimensions. Further investigation is required to address these gaps and enhance our understanding of effective incubator governance.

References

Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: Tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23(2), 127-135.

Aerts, K., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 27(5), 254-267.

Ahmad, A. J., & Ingle, S. (2011). Relationships matter: Case study of a university campus incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(6), 626-644.

Akroyd, C., & Kober, R. (2020). Imprinting founders' blueprints on management control systems. Management Accounting Research, 46, 100645.

Becker, S., & Endenich, C. (2023). Entrepreneurial ecosystems as amplifiers of the Lean startup philosophy – management control practices in earliest-stage startups. Contemporary Accounting Research.

Bedford, D. S., & Ditillo, A. (2022). From governing to managing: Exploring modes of control in private equity relationships. European Accounting Review, 31(4), 843-875.

Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1-2), 20-28.

Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 161-173.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104-124.

Cumming, D., Werth, J. C., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Governance in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Venture capitalists vs. technology parks. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 455-484.

Davila, A., & Foster, G. (2007). Management control systems in early-stage startup companies. The Accounting Review, 82(4), 907-937.

Flanschger, A., Heinzelmann, R., & Messner, M. (2023). Between consultation and control: How incubators perform a governance function for entrepreneurial firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(9), 86-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2020-4950

Hallen, B. L., Cohen, S. L., & Bingham, C. B. (2020). Do accelerators work? If so, how? Organization Science, 31(2), 378-414.

Kusnanto, E. (2022). Performance Measurement Based on Balance Scorecard Perspective of Sustainable Leadership, Corporate Governance and Human Capital in Banking Industry. International Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 4(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.25105/ijca.v4i1.13916

Pelz, M. (2019). Can management accounting be helpful for young and small companies? Systematic review of a paradox. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(2), 256-274.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.

Van Weele, M., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Nauta, F. (2017). You can't always get what you want: How entrepreneur's perceived resource needs affect the incubator's assertiveness. Technovation, 59, 18-33.

Vanderstraeten, J., van Witteloostuijn, A., & Matthyssens, P. (2020). Organizational sponsorship and service co-development: A contingency view on service co-development directiveness of business incubators. Technovation, 98, 102154.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Rohana Rinjani Manurung, U., & Ruslaini. (2024). Balancing Consultation and Control: The Governance Role of Incubators in Entrepreneurial Development . Journal of Economic and Leadership, 1(4), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.70142/jbl.v1i4.14

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.